Why Words Matter, in the Words of Diane Ackerman: An Excerpt from “Language at Play”

The following is an excerpt from “Language at Play,” an essay by Diane Ackerman about the power and use of language, and the role poetry plays in all of our lives.  She says it better than I could.  This is the kind of writing that paralyzes me and that I can only react to after it has lived inside of me for a while.  Enjoy!

We ask the poet to reassure us by giving us a geometry of living, in which all things add up and cohere, to tell us how things buttress one another, circle round and intermelt.  Once the poet has broken life into shards, we ask him to spin around and piece it back together again, making life seem even more fluid than before.  Now it is a fluency of particulars instead of a nebulous surging.  We ask the poet to compress and abbreviate the chaos so we don’t overload from its waterfall of sensations, all of which we nonetheless wish somehow to take in.

Every poem is a game, a ritual dance with words.  In the separate world of the artwork, the poet moves in a waking trance.  By its nature, poetry and all art is ceremonial, which we sometimes forget, except perhaps when we think of the Neolithic cave painters in the mysterium tremens of their task.  Intent on one feature of life, exploring it mentally, developing it in words, a poet follows the rules of the game.  Sometimes artists change the game, impose their own rules and disavow everyone else’s.  Then they become an ist among the isms.  But there are always rules, always tremendous concentration, entrancement and exaltation, always the tension of spontaneity caged by restriction, always risk of failure and humiliation, always the drumbeat of rituals, always the willingness to be shaken to the core.

Once, after a lecture, a woman asked why accomplished scientists and prose writers (such as Loren Eisely), who turned to poetry late in life, were such poor poets.  Is it easier to switch from poetry to prose than from prose to poetry? she wondered.  I don’t think the genre is what matters, but the time of life.  If you read the first book by famous scientists–J. B. S. Haldane, Werner Heisenberg, Francis Crick, Fred Hoyle–you find minds full of passion and wonder.  Those books are thrilling to read because mystery is alive in them, and they are blessed by a youthful, free-flowing enthusiasm.  But in later books these same people become obsessed with politics and sociology; their books are still of intellectual interest, but they’ve lost the sense of marvel.  Those who stay poets all of their lives continue to live in that youthful state, as open and vulnerable and potentially damaging as it can be.

I suppose what most people associate with poetry is soul-searching and fiercely felt emotions.  We expect the poet to be a monger of intensity, to pain for us, to reach into the campfire so that we can watch without burning ourselves.  Because poets feel what we’re afraid to feel, venture where we’re reluctant to go, we learn from their journeys without taking the dramatic risks.  We cherish the insights that poets discover.  We’d love to relish the moment and feel rampant amazement as the seasons unfold.  We yearn to explore the subtleties, paradoxes, and edges of emotions.  We long to see the human condition reveal itself with spellbinding clarity.  Think of all the lessons to be learned from deep rapture, danger, tumult, romance, intuition–but it’s far too exhausting to live like that on a daily basis, so we ask artists to feel and explore for us.  Daring to take intellectual and emotional chances, poets live on their senses.  In promoting a fight of his, a boxer once said: “I’m in the hurt business.”  In a different way, artists are too.

And yet, through their eyes–perhaps because they risk so much–we discover breathtaking views of the human pageant.  Borrowing the lens of an artist’s sensibility, we see the world in a richer way–more familiar than we thought, and stranger than we knew, a world laced with wonder.  Sometimes we need to be taught how and where to seek wonder, but it’s always there, waiting, full of mystery and magic.  I feel that much of my own duty as a writer is to open those doors of vision, shine light into those dark corners of existence, and search for the fountains of innocence.

The world is drenched with color and nature is full of spectacles.  you would think that would be enough.  yet we are driven to add even more sensations to the world, to make our thoughts and feelings available in words.  We use words for many reasons.  As a form of praise and celebration.  To impose an order on the formless clamor of the world.  As a magical intermediary between us and the hostile, unpredictable universe.  For religious reasons, in worship.  For spiritual reasons, to commune with others.  To temporarily stop a world that seems too fast, too random, too chaotic.  To help locate ourselves in nature and give us a sense of home.  Words bring patterns, meaning, and perspective to life.  We keep trying to sum life up, to frame small parts of it, to break it into eye-gulps, into word-morsels that are easier to digest.  Sometimes words allow us to put ourselves in harmony with the universe, to find a balance, however briefly, in life’s hurricane.  They make it possible not only to communicate with one another but to do it in a way that may change someone’s life.

Isn’t it odd that one big-brained animal can alter the course of another’s life, change what the other sees when it looks at its reflection in a mirror, or in the mind’s mirror?  And do that by using the confection of words.  What sort of beings are we who set off on symbolic pilgrimages, pause at mental towns, encounter others who–sometimes without knowing it–can divert or redirect us for years?  What unlikely and magical creatures.  Who could know them in a lifetime?  When I start thinking like this, in words, wonder shoots its rivets into my bones.  I feel lit by a sense of grace, and all my thoughts turn to praise.

*This excerpt is from pp. 184-187 of In Fact: The Best of Creative Nonfiction.   The rest of Ackerman’s essay is well worth reading, as are the other essays included in the book.

About atomsofthought
Photographer. Traveler. Writer. Reader.

11 Responses to Why Words Matter, in the Words of Diane Ackerman: An Excerpt from “Language at Play”

  1. anda says:

    thanks for this! I’ll use in one of my creative writing classes that I teach at University of South FL )St. Pete campus). I’ll have to check out the book also, since I teach Creative Non-fiction.

    • No problem! Isn’t it great? I do think the whole book would be perfect for your class. I bet you’re a wonderful teacher. I found this book the old fashioned way: perusing the shelves of a bookstore. It’s kind of nice 🙂

  2. “Every poem is a game, a ritual dance with words.” I once read how writers love to “play with words”. Nick, you take a blank slate and paint a beautiful sunrise with your words. To share another’s deepest, purest thoughts only intensifies your resolve.

    Poetry for me lights a spark in the “spirit” of wonderment and awe. It is in the silent spaces and pauses that the most intense nuances of the poet and reader are entwined

  3. I couldn’t help but think of Carl Sagan when she mentions “the accomplished scientists and prose writers.” He was a brilliant scientist but also a gifted writer, who had the ability to make science and astronomy both accessible and poetic.

    Have you seen the movie Tree of Life yet? It is not necessarily an easy or enjoyable movie to sit through, but it is truly visual poetry. You have to sit back and let the images and words wash over you, with no expectations. I think you would like it.

    • Yes!!! I thought of exactly the same person, plus Einstein and a few others. But Carl Sagan and Einstein leapt immediately to my mind. Sagan was a hero of mine when I was a kid. I devoured his books. He never lost that sense of wonder. He was always a poet-scientist who wanted more than anything to infect others with his exuberance for the universe. Einstein’s essays on science and just about anything else are among my favorite pieces of writing by anyone. I actually believe that scientists are some of the most romantic, wonderstruck people around. They would have to be to try to tackle mysteries that no one has yet solved, which sounds a lot like pursuing an impossible dream.

      I did see Tree of Life. It had a really complicated effect on me… First of all, it’s set in Waco but it was filmed mostly in Central Texas, in and around Austin, where I grew up (I recognized those downtown Dallas scenes too). So almost every other frame of that movie felt like home, like my childhood, and the movie poked a pinhole in my memory and from that hole a torrent of images and experiences gushed forth as I watched. This has never happened to me before with a movie. I couldn’t separate what I saw on the screen from what I experienced as a kid. The pine forest scenes were in Bastrop State Park, where my family used to camp and hike. Several of the swimming scenes were filmed at Barton Springs or Hamilton Pool. I recognized the springs from the turquoise water alone, before the camera even pulled out to reveal Barton Springs Pool. Smithville, where the neighborhood scenes were filmed, also felt like home. All of those rambling oak trees that lined the streets… the sounds of insects during summer, the heat and humidity that turn the air to something almost liquid that you have to push through, the boys exploring the neighborhood. It was a weird feeling. And the desert scenes were mostly filmed in Death Valley, which you probably recognized. That was also bizarre, because I developed a strong connection with that place. It was kind of a wrenching experience, as you suggested, but I’m glad I saw it. The movie now feels like a living memory rather than something I saw in a theater.

      Well, I just want to share an Einstein quote:

      “A knowledge of the existence of something we cannot penetrate, our perceptions of the profoundest reason and the most radiant beauty, which only in their most primitive forms are accessible to our minds—it is this knowledge and this emotion that constitute true religiosity.”

  4. “They make it possible not only to communicate with one another but to do it in a way that may change someone’s life.”

    Pretty amazing, isn’t it? And I’m so glad of it.

  5. dunelight says:

    Argh…it’s because we have been repeatedly beaten down by life and had most if not all of our dreams and hopes shredded. It does not make for uplifting reading. And so we make a conscious decision to get out of bed, against our will and bodies’ pain, and vow to revel in the small joys and look on the bright side.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: